Al-Māwardī’s (d. 450AH/1058CE) Jurisprudential Thought in Classical Islam: An Integrated and Responsive System of Ijtihād and Taqlīd
Abstract
The development of classical Islamic jurisprudence continues to raise critical questions, particularly regarding the proper framing and assessment of the establishment of legal schools. The decline narrative has held sway in much of the literature. It portrays the establishment of legal schools as a key factor in the downward trajectory of fiqh, especially during and post-fourth/tenth century, due to the dominance of taqlīd (emulating a legal authority) over ijtihād (independent legal reasoning). This article reexamines this narrative by analyzing the relationship between the concepts and procedures of ijtihād and taqlīd in the neglected works of the renowned Shāfiʿī jurist al-Māwardī, particularly al-Ḥāwī al-kabīr. Instead of interpreting ijtihād and taqlīd as oppositional or successive phases in the history of fiqh, the article maintains that al-Māwardī’s jurisprudential thought integrates both procedures as complementary tools to address distinct methodological and sociopolitical demands. To substantiate this central claim, the article examines the meanings, uses, and functions of ijtihād and taqlīd in al-Māwardī’s corpus, demonstrating how taqlīd provided stability during political fragmentation, while ijtihād upheld judicial autonomy and countered esoteric (bāṭinī) hermeneutics. The integration of these concepts as permanent and interdependent elements of fiqh challenges any reading of al-Māwardī within a simplistic decline narrative. Through the case of al-Māwardī, this study aims to contribute to the historiography of Islamic legal thought, offering insights into the enduring dynamism of fiqh as a responsive and methodologically rigorous tradition during the purported moment of decline in the classical period (ca. 2nd/8th–5th/11th centuries).
Full text article
References
Al-Bāqillānī, A. B. M. b. al-Ṭayyib. (1442 AH). Kashf al-asrār wa-hatk al-astār (I. b. M. al-Bīḥī, Ed.; Vols. 1–2). Riyadh: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.
Al-Māwardī, A. l-Ḥ. (1985). Adab al-dunyā wa-l-dīn (M. K. Rājiḥ, Ed.; 4th ed.). Beirut: Dār Iqrāʾ.
Al-Māwardī, A. l-Ḥ. (1989). Al-Aḥkām al-sulṭāniyya wa-l-wilāyāt al-dīniyya (A. M. al-Baghdādī, Ed.; 1st ed.). Kuwait: Maktabat Dār Ibn Qutayba.
Al-Māwardī, A. l-Ḥ. (1994). Al-Ḥāwī al-kabīr fī fiqh al-shāfiʿī wa-huwa sharḥ mukhtaṣar al-Muzanī (ʿA. M. Muʿawwaḍ & ʿĀ. A. ʿAbd al-Mawjūd, Eds.; Vols. 1–18; 1st ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.
Al-Māwardī, A. l-Ḥ. (n.d.). Al-Nukat wa-l-ʿuyūn (al-S. ʿA. I. Ibrāhīm, Ed.; Vols. 1–6). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.
Al-Qaffāl al-Shāshī al-Kabīr, A. B. M. (2007). Maḥāsin al-sharīʿa fī furūʿ al-shāfiʿiyya. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.
Al-Ḥajwī al-Thaʿālibī, M. b. al-Ḥ. (1995). Al-Fikr al-sāmī fī tārīkh al-fiqh al-islāmī (Vols. 1–2). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.
Al-Nājī, L. (2012). ʿAlāqat al-intāj al-fiqhī bi-ʿilm uṣūl al-fiqh al-mudawwan. Al-Manṣūra: Dār al-Kalima li-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzīʿ.
Al-Nājī, L. (2004). ʿAlāqat al-intāj al-fiqhī bi-ʿilm uṣūl al-fiqh al-mudawwan: Dirāsa fī mashrūʿ al-tajdīd. Majallat al-Wāḍiḥa, (2), 279–317.
El Shamsy, A. (2013). The canonization of Islamic law: A social and intellectual history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ephrat, D. (2000). A learned society in a period of transition: The Sunni ‘Ulama’ of eleventh-century Baghdad. New York: State University of New York Press.
Fadel, M. (1996). The social logic of taqlīd and the rise of the mukhtaṣar. Islamic Law and Society, 3(2), 193–233.
Hallaq, W. B. (1984). Was the gate of ijtihād closed? International Journal of Middle East Studies, 16(1), 3–41.
Hītū, M. Ḥ. (1988). Al-Ijtihād wa-ṭabaqāt mujtahidī l-shāfiʿiyya (1st ed.). Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah.
Melchert, C. (2015). Māwardī’s legal thinking. Al-ʿUṣūr al-Wusṭā, 23, 68–86.
Rabb, I. A., & Balbale, A. K. (2017). Justice and leadership in early Islamic courts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schacht, J. (1982). Introduction to Islamic law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
yright and License
Researchers always have copyright. The research published in the Journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. This means that every person can download, read and use the research, provided that he/she relates it to its author appropriately, stating any amendments made. This work cannot be used for commercial purposes.