Difficulties in Approaching the Fundamentalist Interpretation and the Contemporary Western Interpretation

Abstract

This research aims to discuss the obstacles to approaching the fundamentalist interpretation with the contemporary western interpretation. It also aims to discuss the most prominent concepts and theoretical backgrounds. It deals with the concept of approaching and excavation in the genealogy of the term and the cognitive and methodological Arab and Western load. It also conducts a general survey of the most important projects undertaken by their owners in the approaching experience seen in the rapprochement between the Western and Arab fields in the most important pillars that they saw in the output of their research and directed criticism and deep observations to it. It concludes with the productive formula and the intermediate reading that we see in the deep criticism approaches behind the contemporary Arab-Islamic and Western campaigns, and examines the most important active studies in the concept of approaching. The research contains an introduction that discusses the conceptual framework of the term approaching and the chosen formula. It also contains two sections that address the reality of approaching and its concept in contemporary studies. This opened the door to the concept of the axiom of the limits of interpretation, with which contemporary exegesis transcends much vocabulary that denies the truth of interpretation, and gives the reader an authority that obscures all the requirements of searching for the truth of the meaning, and the evidence of the author's meaning. In this way, it competes with the achievements of the fundamentalist interpretation, whose rules and laws have always been keen to capture the truth of interpretation, and its propensity towards exactness and the true intent of the author (i.e., the speaker).