The Problem of the Concept between the Authority of the Meaning and the Disobedience of the Structure

Abstract

The research aims to discover the problem of the concept between the authority of the meaning and the disobedience of the structure, based on the fact that the concept has a rebellious significance because he has not hesitated to offer allegiance to any authority, whether verbal or intellect. And if the significance of the meaning is specific to the addressee, then the significance of the term is tantamount to the transition of that significance from its subjective mental realm to its more general scope, which is the folk indication of the meaning, while the concept expresses broader indications than its predecessors, so it is, as far as its privacy in action and preoccupation, a carrier of transient universal cultural connotations. for disciplines and conventions of the people. Although the term has a systematic mechanical dimension in investment and implementation, the concept has an intentional value dimension in deliberation and understanding. The first was created to perform a specific function in a scientific field governed by a special environment and a scientific tribe, and the second was released to exchange functions amid an open knowledge space, without recognizing the boundaries of the scientific tribes. Because its philosophical value dimension extended from its deliberative field, through time, space and man. This is what should be paid attention to in the time of optical journeys of concepts.